The search for your Cree, Crie, Crea, Cre, Crey and Chree origins
-
Dorothy Gabbey Cree Ludaescher
- Female
- American Fork, UT
- United States
- Blog Posts (1)
- Discussions (2)
- Photos
- Photo Albums
Dorothy Gabbey Cree Ludaescher's Discussions
Hugh Cree And Jane Wallace
Started this discussion. Last reply by Dorothy Gabbey Cree Ludaescher Sep 5, 2016. 2 Replies 0 Likes
To Trevor Cree To start of I am the GG granddaughter of Hugh Cree and Catherine.Hugh Cree is not married to Jane Wallace she is his sister Jane Cree married to John Wallace.Hugh is married to…Continue
Gifts Received
Dorothy Gabbey Cree Ludaescher has not received any gifts yet
Dorothy Gabbey Cree Ludaescher's Page
Profile Information
- Your name
- Dorothy
Dorothy Gabbey Cree Ludaescher's Blog
Henry Cree and Hannah Jane MCQuoid
Posted on June 20, 2016 at 16:01 1 Comment 0 Likes
To Trevor
more corrections sorry
Henry Cree born 1864 son of Jane Cree and Michael Cassidy. not the spouse of Hannah Jane McQuoid
Henry Greer Clelland Cree Born 24 Jan 1921 son of Walter Osborne Cree and Margaret Jane Shaw Johnson Smeaton.
Henry Cree Born 28 Dec 1869 Son of Hugh Cree and Elizabeth Majorie/Majury AKA Eliza.
The above Henry born 1869 is married to Hannah Jane McQuoid not the one born 1864 to Michael Cassidy and Jane Cree. Jane went on to…
Continue
© 2024 Created by Trevor Cree.
Powered by
Comment Wall (1 comment)
You need to be a member of Cree Family History Network to add comments!
Join Cree Family History Network
Hi Dorothy,
I have only now caught up with this thread about the Bangor Cree line. Some members may have assumed that Trevor Cree is to blame for the errors you have alerted us to, but that is not so, The Cree Surname website is my responsibility. I originally had the two Hugh Crees as you have pointed out they should be. (The CreeID number indicates this if you look carefully.) There was a problem which seemed to indicate that I should swap them over. As a result of your posts and checking more thoroughly in my records I have now swapped them back. This raised the original problem which is that Hugh and Eliza (Majorie) Cree have two sons named Henry, born in 1869 and 1888. This normally only happens when the first of the two has died. However this didn't happen here. Henry Cree born 1869 was definitely still alive at the 1911 Census. I guess he had left home when the second Hanry was named in 1888. (He actually married in 1889 at age 19.)
Is there any other explanation? Anyway I shall leave it as is now. I would be very pleased if you would check through the Cree Online Database as it affects the Bangor line and let me know of any further errors or omissions. Please note that details of living persons are not included in order to protect their privacy.
Best Wishes,
Mike SpathakySydney, Australia